Capability: Part 2 – Perspective
Perspective
Since “I” have made peace with the Self-Knowledge>>Self-Awareness algorithm, I want to continue on with my discussion of the components of Capability as I experience them.
But first, one caveat. In order to design LeaderWARE, I believe that you have to have a model that works on itself. In other words, a meta-model has to automatically, without conscious attention, work the magic you intend by merely being in evidence. Which means, if I teach you this model, even if you just walk away and say that is all BS, the meta-model will become psychoactive and work subconsciously, in my opinion.
This is what I have attempted to cynthesize for leaders with LeaderWARE. I’m not arrogant enough to think that this is the model of everything, nor is the model right for everyone, although I do believe anyone can use this in whatever form they are capable, or it wouldn’t be a meta-model, or meta-system. What follows is an overview of each part of CAPABILITY DYNAMICS.
Here is the element of Perspective, a fractal of Capability that I have found IMPORTANT to address in creating Self-Knowledge>>Self-Awareness, along with their major constituents:
Perspective:
Applying | Elaborating | Seeking |
Giving | Assimilating | Integrating |
Taking | Coordinating | Differentiating |
PERSPECTIVE (noun)
1 a: the
technique or process of representing on a
plane or curved surface the spatial
relation of objects as they might appear
to the eye; specifically : representation
in a drawing or painting of parallel lines
as converging in order to give the
illusion of depth and distance
b: a
picture in perspective
2 a: the interrelation in which a
subject or its parts are mentally viewed ;
also : point of view
b: the capacity
to view things in their true relations or
relative importance
3 a: a visible scene; especially :
one giving a distinctive impression of
distance : vista
b: a mental
view or prospect
4: the appearance to the eye of objects in respect to their relative distance and positions
Beginning with the definitions, I think, in general, people have a fairly common “point of view” of perspective and what it might mean, although in making sense, each will use it with a little different “perspective.”
“In our research, we have discovered that the English language contains a number of rich expressions that convey an appreciation of perspectival observation. These include: where you stand depends on where you sit, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, everyone looks at the world through his own glasses, the glass is half-empty or half-full, a self-fulfilling prophecy, it’s the blind man and the elephant, the Rashomon phenomenon, the umpire training school joke about “the pitch ain’t nothin’ until I call it,” and that there are two sides to every story.
Such a broad set of common expressions would lead one to believe that perspectival observation is a widely held assumption in society. Paradoxically, our research and experience within organizations has been the opposite. We have interviewed individuals, for example, who were perfectly willing to accept perspectival observation about what happened at an extended family Thanksgiving dinner, but who would insist that at work there is only one true story of what really happened.” – Eric Dent, Complexity Science: A Worldview Shift
Let me briefly focus on what I mean by outlining 9 elements of perspective.
The same is true of deliberation. It is difficult to be compassionate, and often just as difficult to be detached, but what is most difficult of all is to be both at once.” Only with experience can a person learn to see a fraught situation both close up, with emotional intensity, and far away, with detached perspective. – David Brooks
First Perspective –> New Perspective as a transition, to hold a container for these components or as I might say, transitions in perspective.
I chose to illustrate perspective as a series of what I feel are hierarchical transitions. In other words, the first “application” of perspective, or “applying” a perspective, is less complex than “giving” a perspective and so on to “taking” a perspective.
Look at this video and it will remind you of how limited our perspectives are and how most of us work from a narrow lens to see what is reality.
The Fine Art Of Deception : The Protojournalist : NPR Take a look at this video of a clever 2013 anamorphic installation — by French artist Bernard Pras. It morphs from a portrait of a man to a mundane pile of objects, depending on how you look at it.
In the beginning: All of us have a perspective.
As you walk through my notions of perspective and the lens we form at anyone given time in the perspective-forming process, remember the window that you saw “Pras” work and notice how small it is in relation to all possible views.
Applying
We may be unaware of that
perspective, as in it being objectively known.
Yet, we have one and we apply it as a point of
view when we are being, doing, having,
becoming, and contributing, which I’ll start
abbreviating now as BDHBC to save time. BDHBC
are values vectors, which I’ll discuss later
in ValuDYNAMICS.
Walk with me through some “figurative”
examples of the notions of perspective using
my RED CAR theme to illustrate perspectival
shifts.
I have the fastest RED CAR
on the road.
Giving
When we start to become
aware that we have a perspective, we can then
give it consciously, and know that we can give
our perspective. This is hierarchically
more complex than just “using subjectively
what we have as a perspective”, or as you will
soon learn, “being subject to your
perspective.”
I have a RED CAR. It is the
fastest RED CAR on the road, and it can win
any race against any other car.
Taking
To take a perspective means
that you can step outside your own perspective
as object and actually “take, or try on” a
perspective that is different from the one you
have. It means that we can step away from our
perspective long enough to know that there is
another perspective available. It doesn’t mean
that we can use the new perspective, it just
means we are capable of taking one,
acknowledging it exists.
I heard there are BLUE CARS
that are fast, but they haven’t raced against
my RED CAR.
Elaborating
When we are able to discuss
our own perspective, and provide someone else
with the “Teachable Points Of View” [TPOV] of
our perspective, we are said to be able to
elaborate our perspective. Often this will be
in contrast, or comparison to another
perspective or perspectives that are different
from ours.
We are able to point to the
differences, but not yet reject our own
perspective. Because once we can elaborate our
own perspective, we are able to use it well,
even if it’s not appropriate or proper, or
even fit to the application or requirements.
My RED CAR is the fastest
car on the road, because I have spent plenty
of money making sure the motor, transmission,
and tires give me the best advantage
available.
Assimilating
Assimilation has to do with
beginning to bring other pieces not originally
contained in the original perspective,
including mashing up disparate perspectives so
they don’t make much sense, to bringing in
sophistication to the original perspective by
adapting it with the new information.
Simply, transitioning a
statement like “I believe that RED CARS are
the fastest cars on the road.” → a
perspective, too, “I believe that RED CARS are
the fastest on the road because my RED CAR is
the fastest on the road because it can win
against any BLUE CAR, which some people think
is the fastest car on the road.” — is a simple
assimilation.
Coordinating
Being able to objectively
combine or coordinate two perspectives
simultaneously is a further use of perspective
and demonstrates a different level of
capability, almost always a more complex task,
than the previous ways in which I have used
perspective to describe capability.
Some believe that RED CARS
are the fastest, and others have thought BLUE
CARS are the fastest cars on the road. So I
think it might be a good idea to test this by
having all RED CARS race to find the fastest
RED CAR, and all BLUE CARS race to find the
fastest BLUE CAR and then having a match off
race.
Seeking
Seeking a perspective
requires a more complex view. It means holding
one’s perspective, while testing that
perspective against other perspectives,
usually to make the held perspective “better”
or more robust. There seems to be a difference
when people are willing to “test” their
perspective against other perspectives,
knowing that their perspective may not be the
best perspective, or most appropriate, fit or
sustainable.
I will take my RED CAR and
race against other RED CARS to see if I am the
fastest RED CAR, because I have raced other
BLUE CARS and I won.
Integrating
Bringing things in a
perspective together and showing how they make
your perspective actually more robust or not
is a powerful process because it shows that
the perspective has been tested and can stand
up to any problem that you currently have.
My RED CAR, with all it’s
new additions which I made as a result of
racing all other RED and BLUE CARS is now the
best RED CAR available.
Differentiating
What happens in this
particular part of perspective is something
odd, which causes the success of integration
to no longer solve the problem, or remain
appropriate, or even be fit to the
circumstances. It is where abandonment begins
to occur, and that the need for a new
perspective begins to appear.
It might seem that consolidation after integration is where things remain robust and where anti-fragility occur, but it seems that new problems arise and the old perspective is suffering diminishing returns.
My RED CAR was the fastest
car in drag racing, so now there is no one to
race, so I took it out to a road course where
ORANGE CARS are racing, and I realized that my
RED CAR was no longer the fastest car.
Summary of
Perspective
While these are all simple
examples to help you understand what might
appear to be subtle or minute differences,
they help us greatly in understanding what is
next and also how to scaffold a person with a
particular perspective in transition.
We can use three states: an
entering state, a nodal state, and an exiting
state to define the three sets of perspectives
for discussion.
Perspective:
Entering | Nodal | Exiting |
Applying | Elaborating | Seeking |
Giving | Assimilating | Integrating |
Taking | Coordinating | Differentiating |
In the next part of
CAPABILITY DYNAMICS, I’ll discuss
Subjectivity. Subjectivity gives us part
of the language we need to discuss other
components of perspective, and CAPABILITY.
If you have any comments, questions, suggestions, or need some additional help, please use the form below to submit them. Someone will get back to you within 48 hours. Or if you prefer, at the bottom of this page leave your comment and someone will get back to you.
If you are not yet a Gold Member, consider becoming one
today and begin accessing all of your FREE information on
LeaderW@RE. Many people ask, “What is LeaderW@RE and
how will I benefit by learning more about it.”
To answer that question, the first thing you will be given
access to is the paper titled: “What is LeaderW@RE”.
Next you will receive my Exposé in Leader Development.
Depending on when you register, there may be more content
to share with you as we are adding content on a regular
basis.
Register HERE now.

We hope you pick up valuable insights, ideas, and
tools during this process, which you can use for your own development as
well as your work and leadership with others.
You, Me, and We @F-L-O-W
Mike R. Jay is a developmentalist utilizing consulting, coaching, mentoring and advising as methods to offer developmental scaffolding for aspiring leaders who are interested in being, doing, having, becoming, and contributing… to helping people have lives.



© Generati
Learn how you may become a member of our Inner Circle and receive the cutting edge on the most current thinking in Leader Development. Visit http://LivingAtFLOW.com/innercircle